This Etherpad:



Goal: 

Webcraft Challenges:

Badge and Assessment models/work:

Badges for Webcraft Challenges - Integration Points:
Erin's initial thoughts:

Jessica's initial thoughts:

Philipp's initial thoughts

Features / Requirements
Existing features pulled from http://pad.p2pu.org/badge-integration - not sure how to include all of this here since this is a rewrite of my features. Tried to just work with your rewrite below.

ROLES

(1) Badge Admins (new role on p2pu)

(2) Study Group/Course Participants (or users that want to get a badge)
     CHLOE: 3 WAYS TO AWARD A PEER BADGE:

ASSESSMENTS LOGIC

RE: ALGORITHMS {DOWN THE ROAD}:
1) ASSESSMENT COMBOS: A badge could be made out of different assessment types, such as mentor, peer, guru and stealth. Here is a quick breakdown of the different combinations for assessment:
                    Badges can be awarded by (Bold the ones I think we will have for Web101):
2) ASSESSMENT VALUE: Different assessors have different value, i.e. a mentor's assessment weights in more heavily than a peer's.
                    Badges can be awarded based on (note: numbers are indicative):
NOTE: I see problems with both these options, such as creating a point system might prove not to be sustainable when community numbers change, i.e. if you have 10 participants vs 300. A number of participants value could be added to the algorithm as a solution.
With the second option we don't cover badges than can be awarded from both peers, gurus, mentors etc.  Could be solved by having custom setting for each individual badge, i.e. i want the condition for this badge to be that x mentors rate it higher than 2 and y peers higher than 3. 

BADGES

BADGE TASKS (within each Challenge)

WORK SUBMISSIONS

WALL ACTIVITIES

AWARDED BADGES

OPEN BADGE INFRASTRUCTURE

METRICS

SMARTOOLS

ROLES

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Open questions: